Feellife Coffee e liquid flavor: Our coffee e-liquid flavor is barista approved. Taste rich, whole-bean coffee with just the right amount of cream and sugar in this vape juice.
Will I like it?
Forget about going through a long drive-through line, or booking a vacation on the French Riviera to get a taste of the freshly brewed coffee beans you crave. When it comes to coffee e-juice, we are seasoned baristas, ready to serve you up a fragrant serving of e-liquid. No, that isn't steam from our espresso machine. It's the aromatic vapor that envelops you as you puff on these invigorating coffee vape juices. We've sweetened the deal with hazelnut, mocha, caramel and vanilla in many of these blends to add an extra dollop of indulgence. Choose from several nicotine flavors to find the vape that's perfect for you. Vapers can also find VG-only coffee e-liquid on our site that's tailored for customers who have allergies or any type of sensitivity to propylene glycol. Ultimo Vapor E-Juice also tempts vape mod users with its high-VG Barista's Blend.
Capacity: 10ml,15ml, 30ml, 60ml, 120ml
Nicotine Strength: 0mg/g, 8mg/g, 12mg/g, 18mg/g, 24mg/g
Ingredients: Herbal extract/Glycerol/ Propylene glycol/Flavorings/Nicotine
Bottle type: Child proof cap
Package: top-grade plastic package
Certificates: TUV, MSDS, JRFL, ISO, FDA, GMP, SGS
New Ideas, Same Traditions
Fruits Series is shisha alternative composing of 100% natural compressed fruit extracts. Stored in foil and air-tight containers to preserve freshness. It generates only soft, natural flavour with a long-lasting sweet aftertaste when steamed. No harmful, waste combustion elements that are associating with traditional Shisha products.
Fruits Series is easy-to-use and maintain high levels of continual flavor throughout each use. All ingredients are completely natural, high-quality and pharmaceutical approved. We offer a huge range of big, bold flavors and with our patent protected product, we are one of a kind.
FRUITS SERIES FEATURES:
All FRUITS SERIES flavours last up to 3 hours, producing a consistent, rich flavour. All flavours profiles are produced with:
All Natural Ingredients
Easy To Fill
Are Patent Protected
Contain No Tar
Contain No Dye
Preserved With Foil
Not suitable for anyone under 18, pregnant or breast feeding women. Keep locked up and out of the reach of children, always keep in a cool, dry and dark place. Avoid contact with skin and eyes, in case of contact rinse with plenty of water. If swallowed, seek medical advice immediately (show the label where possible).
THE HIGHEST STANDARDS
We’ve invested in the highest-grade packaging to make sure that our liquids are delivered in a safe manner. Our bottles are filled at a pharmaceutical-grade facility, our bottle caps meet national standards for child resistance, and each bottle is individually shrink-wrapped to prevent leakage in transport. We think it’s important to make sure that you get every drop safely and securely to enhance your vaping experiences.
Since set up in 2009, FEELLiFE has focused on the research and development and production of e-liquid, rapidly developed into the top global e-liquid OEM manufacturer, providing high-quality e-liquid products for many well-known e-liquid brands all over the world.
With modern international standard factory, pharmaceutical grade dust-free workshop and assembly line, FEELLiFE make sure every bottle of e-liquid to meet the requirements of high quality.
Factory Address: 202 North California Ave, City of Industry CA 91744 U.S.A.
Getting the Vapors Over Vaping
To this lifelong non-smoker, using electronic cigarettes (“vaping”) seems like a desirable and effective tool for weaning nicotine addicts off the toxic clouds of smoke with which they fumigate their lungs. I do understand why an educated observer might disagree — less so why the issue has become intensely partisan.
Smoking has been controversial for centuries. While Sir Walter Raleigh popularized tobacco in England, King James I described smoking as, “A custome lothsome to the eye, hatefull to the Nose, harmefull to the braine, dangerous to the Lungs, and in the blacke stinking fume thereof, neerest resembling the horrible Stigian smoke of the pit that is bottomelesse.”
E-cigarettes, a high-tech creation, were created as a tool for smoking abatement. Evidence suggests they are the single most successful means of weaning smokers off the carcinogen-laced smoke they crave. For vapers, the nicotine arrives via droplets of vapor, often scented with very un-tobacco-like fragrances, such as mango, peppermint, coffee or lemonade. (The well-known carcinogenic effects of smoking come largely from chemicals other than nicotine.)
In particular, e-cigarettes use digital technology to deliver the smoker’s desired nicotine hit far more effectively than delivery mechanisms like nicotine gum and patches. Thus, vaping seems to make it easier to quit smoking than other approaches.
Still, there is controversy. Let’s explore some relevant facts:
First, smoking tobacco poses terrible health hazards for smokers and is likely the largest single cause of preventable deaths. Vaping poses health hazards, too, but far less than those associated with smoking tobacco.
Second, we can categorize several groups whose behavior changes with the introduction of e-cigarettes — in order of desirability. (A) Smokers who shift from smoking to vaping and then quit vaping. (B) Smokers who shift from smoking to vaping. (C) Non-smokers who shift from abstinence to vaping. (D) Non-smokers who shift from abstinence to vaping and then proceed on to smoking.
Third, people have subjective tradeoffs among the four (A), (B), (C), and (D) categories based in part on their perceptions of the relative health hazards of smoking and vaping.
If you think e-cigarettes move lots of people into categories (A) and (B) and very few into (C) and (D), then you probably think vaping is a good thing. If you think very few will use e-cigarettes as an exit ramp — (A) and (B) — and lots will use them as an entry ramp — (C) and (D) — then you probably oppose e-cigarettes.
Then there are the subjective aspects. Smith and Jones might agree that vaping induces 10 smokers to shift to vaping for every one nonsmoker induced to vape. Smith, though, might argue that one nonsmoker-to-vaper is too high a price to pay for those 10 who go from smoking to vaping (particularly if the one is a minor). Jones, in contrast, might see that 10-to-1 ratio as an acceptable tradeoff.
One of the most contentious public policy issues is the range of fragrances. E-cigarette vendors argue that they help smokers lose their taste for tobacco. (Vapers in my office confirm to me that after using the aromatic blends for a while, the smell of tobacco becomes repugnant.) Others, though, argue that the sweet flavors attract nonsmokers — especially those too young legally to smoke or vape.
To repeat, I tend to favor broad use of vaping for smoking cessation. My logic is as follows: The cost of smoking in terms of human misery is enormous. Vaping seems to be the most effective route to smoking cessation. Vaping doesn’t appear to attract a terribly large number of nonsmokers — including the young, and the same goes for the aromas.
I find the data to be compelling, but I understand how one might conclude otherwise.
What is more mysterious is how this particular issue has degenerated into one more hyperpartisan conflagration. With some exceptions, conservatives/Republicans champion vaping and liberals/Democrats hate it. For me, the left’s opposition is all the more peculiar, given their widespread support for dispersing condoms, methadone and clean needles for harm reduction. The same A-B-C-D logic applies to these programs as well as to vaping.
The best explanation for this sharp ideological/partisan divide is one I use with increasing familiarity, “It’s 2018.”
Post time: Jul-26-2018