Denmark Judge E Liquid

Denmark Judge E Liquid

Overview Quick Details Place of Origin: SHENZHEN, CHINA (Mainland) weight: 23g puffs:up to 500 puffs size: 118mm length for the tube: 170mm length for the pen: 131mm color: customized Certificate: CE ROHS FCC flavors: feellife fruit flavor, feellife nicotine salt , feellife vitamin B12 or...
Chat Now

Product Details

Nicotine free Feellife  Denmark Judge  E LIQUID from Tobacco Series By Feellife

 







1 capactiy 10ml 30ml 60ml  nicotine free Feellife Denmark Judge eliquid flavour from Tobacco Series













An appreciable concentrate on its own as well as in gourmet recipe, which requires a sufficient maturation time.

This flavor contains tobacco absolute and extract.

 

Capacity: 10ml,15ml, 30ml, 60ml, 120ml

Nicotine Strength: 0mg/g,  8mg/g,  12mg/g,  18mg/g,  24mg/g

Ingredients: Herbal extract/Glycerol/ Propylene glycol/Flavorings/Nicotine

Bottle type: Child proof cap

Package: top-grade plastic package

Certificates: TUV, MSDS, JRFL, ISO, FDA, GMP, SGS

We produce :

Feellife free nicotine Denmark Judge E LIQUID from tobacco series

Feellife 10ml nicotine Denmark Judge E LIQUID strength 8mg from tobacco series

Feellife 30ml nicotine Denmark Judge E juice strength12mg from tobacco series

Feellife 60ml nicotine  Denmark Judge E LIQUID strength 16mg from tobacco series

Feellife 30ml nicotine  Denmark Judge E LIQUID strength 18mg from tobacco series

Feellife 30ml nicotine Denmark Judge EJUICE strength 24mg from tobacco series

 

FEELLIFE Tobacco Series

We want to create the best Tobacco Series e-Liquids possible. Here is our classic Tobacco Series Range: the finest, premium quality, all-natural and pharmaceutically approved ingredients. This is the reason why we are known worldwide for our first-class products.

All e-Liquids undergo independent quality control and are GCC and TPD compliant, with many international certificates. Our production line uses only high-quality and environmentally friendly ingredients. In order to encompass the best flavours possible, we obtain from raw fruit extracts and genuine tobacco extracts. The ingredients used in our products promote the precise taste and natural elements which is to define our Silver Label flavours.

Tobacco Series FEATURES:

Feellife uses only high-quality and environment-friendly ingredients that are free of harmful substances.

 

  • Made in      China

  • Molecular      technology secures natural extracts

  • High-quality      pharmaceutical grade solvents

  • Natural      flavour extracts

  • Fully      TPD Compliant

  • Huge      range of flavours

 

 

                                                     FEELLIFE INTRODUCTION

Since set up in 2009, FEELLiFE has focused on the research and development and production of e-liquid, rapidly developed into the top global e-liquid OEM manufacturer, providing high-quality e-liquid products for many well-known e-liquid brands all over the world.

With modern international standard factory, pharmaceutical grade dust-free workshop and assembly line, FEELLiFE make sure every bottle of e-liquid to meet the requirements of high quality.


1 Feellife USA Feellife 10ml nicotine Denmark Judge E LIQUID for electronical cigarettes strength12mg from tobacco series


                            

 


 Factory Address:  202 North California Ave, City of Industry CA 91744 U.S.A.

China factory

 

 2 Feellife China Factory Feellife 30ml nicotine  Denmark Judge E juice strength12mg for ecigs from tobacco series


 

Exhibition

3 Feellife Exhibition Feellife 30ml nicotine  Denmark Judge E LIQUID strength 8mg for disposable cigarettes from tobacco series E JUICE

 






Industry News




A UK Government Committee Releases Positive Report on E-Cigs

vaping-clouds10 Denmark Judge

 

Last week on the 17th of August, the Science and Technology Committee released a report containing several evidence-based policy proposals for e-cigarettes. These proposals are aimed at tackling the current misconceptions about the devices, and positively transform the way vaping is viewed by businesses, institutions and the public alike.

In response to this report, the New Nicotine Alliance (NNA) released a statement saying that it applauds the Committee’s efforts. “The New Nicotine Alliance (NNA) warmly welcomes this report for its clear and unequivocal message that e-cigarettes and other alternative nicotine products are far safer than combustible tobacco and should be treated as such.”

“E-cigarettes are a proven safer alternative to smoking and the UK boasts 1.5 million former smokers who have converted from combustible tobacco to exclusively vaping instead. The Science and Technology Committee has wisely recognised that misconceptions about e-cigarettes are threatening further progress in encouraging their use by smokers who choose to quit.” said NNA Chair Sarah Jakes.

 

The public lacks knowledge about the relative benefits of e-cigs

The NNA pointed out that sadly the general perception of the benefits of e-cigarettes as harm reduction tools has stalled, so the Committee’s recommended advertising rules are welcomed. “We welcome the Committee’s call for a root and branch review of how risk-reduced products are treated by businesses, institutions and government itself. The report is a beacon of enlightenment in an area of public health which is often burdened by dogma and outdated thinking towards the use of nicotine.”

The Committee is also proposing to review provisions in the Tobacco and Related Products Regulations, to include HnBs in the Government’s annual review of safer nicotine products, and also reassess the evidence supporting the ban on snus. “This report dovetails with the government’s Tobacco Control Plan commitment to back innovative products in its drive to encourage smokers to quit, and its recommendations are evidence-based and designed to maximise the benefits of safer nicotine delivery.”

 

Clearing the confusion that surrounds e-cigarettes

Jakes added that sadly misinformation about the relative risks associated with vaping is still rife, and this report aims to sift through this confusion and help reverse some of the damage that it has caused. “There is a lot of confusion about e-cigarettes amongst the public, health institutions and businesses”, said Jakes.

“This report is therefore timely and could have hugely positive implications for public health if its recommendations are implemented in full. Sir Norman’s committee has done an excellent job of peering through the mist of misunderstanding surrounding e-cigarettes and its policy proposals can go a long way to dispel the – often deliberately fabricated – misconceptions that are deterring many thousands of smokers from switching. We would urge the government to read the Committee’s findings carefully and act on them without delay.”

from vapingpost.com

 

Post time: Aug-21-2018




 

Opinion: a vape tax would cost more than what the government thinks

 vaping-clouds10 Denmark Judge

 

The UK government is currently considering introducing a sin tax on vape products for the purpose of finding additional resources to fund the NHS. Theresa May’s government is looking to add an additional tax of 5% to vape products, which would directly impact the UK’s 2.9 million vapers and jeopardise successes achieved through the UK’s progressive approach towards tobacco harm reduction.

The UK has a leading role in the world of tobacco harm reduction and nearly a quarter of all smokers were able to either use electronic cigarettes in order to quit smoking or reduce smoking. This is five times as much as the global average. But its leading role is not only shown by the astonishing number of vapers in the country but also by the fact that even the NHS admits that switching from traditional cigarettes to electronic cigarettes reduces the risk of cancer and other smoking-related diseases.

The UK is often called a vape nation and its embrace of harm reduction is novel in a world where most public health institutions including the World Health Organization (WHO) still actively block tobacco harm reduction. One of many examples of the WHO’s opposition to vaping is their suggestion to its members to ban indoor vaping even though there’s no evidence supporting this policy recommendation. The active opposition to safer and healthier methods of consuming nicotine reminds one of dark times when many institutions blocked the distribution of condoms and thus made HIV harm reduction harder.

Introducing a vape tax in order to realize populist promises to increase the NHS’ funding would not only be short-sighted but also counter-productive. Consumers will be harmed by making the transition to less risky products such as electronic cigarettes more expensive. Further taxing vape products ultimately makes them more expensive, which decreases the likelihood that smokers will make the switch.

It is also important to note that vapers actually reduce the fiscal burden for NHS, given that vape products are significantly less risky. The Royal College of Physicians endorses vaping as a healthier substitute to smoking and many experts second its view that vaping is at least 95% less harmful than traditional cigarettes.

A recent Gallup survey shows that especially millennials tend to switch to electronic cigarettes as a less-harmful way of consuming nicotine. Older generations are often still unaware of the health benefits of vaping. So instead of treating it as a sin and taxing it, we should actively inform smokers about the advantages of switching. This is good for smokers and public finances.

Less vapers means more smoking-related diseases the NHS will have to deal with. The tax could at the end of the day even cost significantly more than it will yield in revenues. A no-brainer that the Chancellor of the Exchequer should better drop this idea.

At the end of the day this sin tax punishes consumers who are otherwise saving the NHS money. In terms of public health, harm reduction, and consumer choice, creating a vape sin tax is a big mistake. Britain can lead as a shining beacon of tobacco harm reduction in the world. We should not lose this advantage by introducing a costly tax.

from elitebusinessmagazine.co.uk

 

Post time: Aug-09-2018













Inquiry